Acts of insolence are very rampant on the Internet thess days. Unfortunately, I have seen someone who was regarded as God’s preacher by blind followers doing such. According to thefreedictionary.com, ” insolence is the trait of being rude and impertinent; inclined to take liberties.” Although the Catholic Priest, Abe Arganiosa still claims that he is decent, any person who knows how to discern a decent person from what is not will disagree by just reading his articles.
I just remembered a question asked by the Apostle Paul to a sorcerer named Elymas which can be read in the Book of Acts 13:10 “And said, O full of all subtilty and all mischief, thou child of the devil, thou enemy of all righteousness, wilt thou not cease to pervert the right ways of the Lord?.” If I were to answer the question of the Apostle Paul, there are really people like the Catholic Priest Abe Arganiosa who will not cease to pervert the right ways of the Lord. The articles he has written on his blog is a clear manifestation on how the devil has a great influence in his manner of reasoning. I am going to dissect the contents on his article in order to prove how deluded his thinking is.
Abe Arganiosa says:
Here is my latest response to the Ang Dating Daan [ADD] apologists who keep on posting here links to their Blogs, inviting me to read their claims. Well, I have no time for that. I leave that apostolate to our lay Catholic Apologists but once they come here, I will response to them point by point.
Was there something on my comment inviting him to read our blogs as he claims? There was clearly none. In fact, he even quoted what I’ve stated.
It’s alright if you don’t care to visit our blogs. Former Catholics like us will continue to defend our new found faith. The Catholic Priest has repeatedly said that Bro. Eli Soriano is a Rapist without carefully examining if that is true or not. Was he able to witness the incident? Was he even raped in order to cry for justice?
That is a very weak argument for those people who knows that Bro. Eli is just a victim of false information circulating on the perverted minds of bigots who doesn’t know how to defend their faith properly.
We shall continue this discussion on the Internet as we deem appropriate.
Any person who knows basic English understands that we have clearly stated that it doesn’t really matter to us if Abe Arganiosa visits our blog or not. There was not invitation for him whatsoever on my comment. Why did this Catholic Priest say that we are inviting him? The first paragraph on his article is already delusional. This faulty reasoning manifests his incredible manner of writing. The next part of his first paragraph may shock experienced computer Internet users.
Abe Arganiosa says,
Since this exchange was uprooted from original post where the comments were posted I answered in capital letters to contrast my response with the one from ADD. It is not intented to shout whatsoever.
Here is one of the latest exchange with them:
For people who are already familiar with the way Abe Arganiosa write his replies, everyone can attest that this Priest is really fond of using Capital Letters on his articles and comments each time he bursts with emotions. This was also noticed by another blogger who is in no manner a fan of ADD, Pinoy Reformista.
Pinoy Reformista wrote,
(*Mapapansin na ang mga titik ay naka-Uppercase, na nagpapahiwatig na ang manunulat ay nangungusap nang pasigaw). Sa tingin niyo po ba ay maka-Cristiano ang uri ng pakikipagtalakayan (apologetics) ni Ginoong Abe?
Translation: (*It is noticeable that the letters used were in Uppercase, which signifies that the writer is speaking in a manner of shouting). Do you thing that this is a Christian act of discussion (apologetics) of Mr. Abe?
Even an Email etiquette tip attests to what Pinoy Reformista said.
Email Etiquette Tip – DON’T SHOUT!
If you USE ALL CAPS in your email or message board posts, you will immediately make yourself seem inexperienced or ignorant. Most experienced computer users consider the use of all capital letters to be the Internet equivalent of shouting.
For those of us who spend a lot of time hanging out in cyberspace, messages written in all capital letters are reminiscent of trying to hold a conversation in which one person is shouting every word while others are speaking at a normal volume.
Now that I have proven how faulty his reasoning is for using ALL CAPS on his reply, let us see how stupid his statements are.
Abe Arganiosa says,
IT ONLY SHOWS THAT AS YOU DEFEND THE DOCTRINES INVENTED BY MAMA ELI YOU HAVE MANIFESTED IGNORANCE OF YOUR FORMER FAITH. IT IS A PITY THAT YOU HAVE DECIDED TO FOLLOW THE TEACHINGS INVENTED BY A FALSE PROPHET WHO MERELY APPEARED IN THE LATTER TIMES RATHER THAN THE APOSTOLIC CHURCH THAT GAVE THE BIBLE TO THE WORLD.
I beg to disagree with what was said by this Celibate Monster. Upon carefully listening and examining everything that Bro. Eli preaches, it was beyond a shadow of a doubt that everything is base on the Bible. On the other hand, everything that I’ve learned from the Catholic Church are purely base on man made traditions. The Bible prohibits the use of the title “Father” to a preacher of God contrary to what Catholic Priests do; The Bible prohibits the use of graven images on acts of worship which the Catholics are guilty of no matter how hard they try to justify it; The Bible prohibits vain and repetitious prayers which Catholics are fond of doing whenever they recite the Rosary. I cannot be a part of a Church who plotted murders of people in the Inquisition and the Crusades. How can a Church like that claim to be Christian when its acts are none Christian at all? Sadly, this Church who claims to have given the Bible to the world is the one teaching doctrines and doing deeds contrary to the Bible.
Abe Arganiosa says,
MAMA ELI IS ACCUSED OF HOMOSEXUAL RAPE IN THE COURT OF LAW. THAT IS A FORMAL AND SERIOUS COMPLAINT BECAUSE IT INVOLVES CRIMINAL ACT. AT THE SAME TIME THE ACCUSATION IS ABOMINABLE TO THE LORD BECAUSE HOMOSEXUAL ACTS ARE CONDEMNED IN THE BIBLE. HOW MUCH MORE HOMOSEXUAL RAPE?
What difference does a homosexual rape makes compared to a heterosexual rape? They are both classified as sin base on the bible. The gravity of both offense are just the same. However, the blind eyes coupled with a lying heart of this homophobic moron fails to see the fact that those complaints are just baseless and nonsense accusations. Another odd thing about him is when he said that Bro. Eli is guilty although Bro. Eli was just simply being accused. There is no such thing as presumption of guilt in the law followed in our country. What was clearly stated on the constitution is the presumption of innocence whereas the government would need to prove the guilt of an accused person before declaring him guilty.
presumption of innocence. a fundamental protection for a person accused of a crime, which requires the prosecution to prove its case against the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt.
Remember that we’re in the Philippines wherein we uphold the presumption of innocence instead of the presumption of guilt.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall be presumed innocent until the contrary is proved (Sec. 14(2), Art. III, 1987 Constitution; Sec. 1(a), Rules of Court). Unless his guilt is shown beyond reasonable doubt, he is entitled to an acquittal (Sec. 2, Rule 133, Rules of Court; United States vs. sicor, 1 Phil. 304; People vs. Corachea, 91 SCRA 422).
“It is better to acquit a man on reasonable doubt, even though he may in reality be guilty, than to confine in the penitentiary for the rest of his natural life a person who may be innocent.”(People vs. Manoji, 68 Phil. 471)
Accusation is not synonymous with guilt. The prosecution must overthrow the presumption of innocence with proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt. To meet this standard, there is need for the most careful scrutiny of the testimony of the State; both oral and documentary, independently of whatever defense is offered by the accused, Only if the judge below and the appellate tribunal could arrive at a conclusion that the crime had been committed precisely by the person on trial under such exacting test should the sentence be one of conviction (People vs. Dramaya, 42 SCRA 60).
The reason why I am compelled to quote from the Philippine Constitution is because this Priest seems to act as a lawyer who doesn’t even know what he is saying.
Abe Arganiosa says,
IF HE WANTS TO PROVE HIS INNOCENCE BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT. LET HIM APPEAR IN COURT, PLEAD NOT GUILTY AND PRESENT HIS EVIDENCES AS WELL AS WITNESSES. THAT IS THE ONLY WAY.
An accused does not necessarily need to appear in court immediately in order to prove his innocence.The case should be reviewed by a public prosecutor which is part of the process that happened to the case of Bro. Eli Soriano.
When the prosecutor saw that the case is a result of a rift ongoing between INC and ADD, and the complainant is indisputably ill-motivated, he decided to dismiss the case.
In order to provide more information on this article, regarding the rape case which is repeatedly stated by the deluded Abe Arganiosa, let me quote some paragraphs from the blog http://jakeastudillo.wordpress.com/.
On October 5, 2005, Otto Macabulos, Asst. Provincial Prosecutor addressed an information to Jesus Manarang, Provincial Prosecutor, Province of Pampanga, that Mr. Soriano is presently facing two counts of rape (no bail recommended) that he filed pending preliminary investigation with the Prosecutor’s office in San Fernando. The information said Veridiano claimed that he was sexually abused on May 17, 2000 at around 1:30 in the afternoon and on June 8, 2001 around 3:00 in the afternoon. The information further said it was physically impossible for the accused suspect (Soriano) to carry out the alleged crimes as there are documents for him of his whereabouts.
The hard evidences given for the rape charge (Ra 8353), page 5 Resolution said: 1) On May 17, 2000 at around 1:30 in the afternoon, Soriano went to the Biological Health Center in Malate, Manila to undergo chelation therapy. It took him about 3 hours and on the basis of records, the respondent was treated at the clinic. After the chelation therapy, he went directly to Lipa city, Batangas for a Bible Exposition which started at 7pm to 11pm. Soriano never left the stage all throughout the event.
Both Dr. Jean Marzan and Dr. Frederick D. Franciso of the Biological Center attested that on such date and at that time, and on the basis of their records, the respondent was treated at the clinic.
The information further said that on June 8, 2001, that Veridiano said he was raped for the second instance at about 3 o’clock in the afternoon, Soriano together with Rico Fernandez at 11:30 in the morning went to the Office of one Ma. Evangeline Veliora in a bank located in Bambang, Manila. They then proceeded to meet a certain Aida Briones, an accountant recommended by Veloira as regards the loan they were applying for. Fernandez, Veliora, and Briones each had written an affidavit to affirm that Soriano was with them that day. These affidavits were notarized by Bernardo Cuaresma on October 21, 2005.”
It is clear that evidences and testimonies were already presented for the dismissal of the case. There is no rational argument to insist that Bro. Eli is guilty of the accusation hurled against him on the grounds of presumption of innocence and base on the evidences presented of the incredibility of the circumstances that surrounds it.
Another question that I posted for the Catholic Priest, Abe Arganiosa to answer is the question of his crying for justice for the rape case. Was he a witness to the alleged crime to be sure that it really happened? Was he the victim of rape to seek justice? Let us analyze his ambiguous stand on when and how to cry for justice.
Abe Arganiosa says,
NONE OF MY RELATIVES HAVE BEEN KILLED BY THE AMPATUANS YET I CRIED FOR JUSTICE TO BRING THE ACCUSED TO THE COURT OF LAW. NONE OF MY RELATIVES WERE KILLED IN THE DACER-CORBITO OR NIDA BLANCA CASE. YET I CRIED FOR JUSTICE TO THE VICTIMS AND THEIR FAMILIES. WHEN THE FAMOUS MAYOR OF LAGUNA, SANCHES, WAS ACCUSED OF RAPE THE ENTIRE NATION CRIED FOR JUSTICE.
DO YOU WANT US TO STOP CRYING FOR JUSTICE BECAUSE I WAS NOT THE ONE RAPED? HOW ABOUT THE AMPATUANS SHALL I ALSO STOP CRYING FOR JUSTICE TO THE VICTIMS IN MAGUINDANAO BECAUSE I AM NOT ONE OF THOSE KILLED? YOUR REASONING DEFIES NOT ONLY LOGIC BUT ALSO HUMAN INTELLIGENCE. THAT KIND OF REASONING IS PROPER FOR ANIMALS BUT NOT FOR HUMAN BEINGS WHO HAVE COMPASSION FOR THE VICTIMS AND LOVE OF TRUTH AS WELL AS JUSTICE.
To use the case of the Maguindanao Massacre and compare it with the alleged rape case filed in court is a wrong analogy. 50 people were clearly murdered while Daniel Veridiano was not clearly raped. There’s no need to cry for justice over an impossible crime which was use to give burden to the Innocent. We can cry for justice for the victims of the Maguindanao Massacre but there is no need to cry for Justice for Daniel Veridiano. He himself attests that no harm has been done to him by Bro. Eli or by the congregation.
He even had a written statement of his confession about the evil acts before he was excommunicated.
No matter how hard he deny and say that he did not wrote this letter, his video is clearly not a forgery. Daniel Veridiano was actually excommunicated for raping more than twenty men in the Department he heads. The man allegedly crying for rape is the real rapist.
That was proven by the testimonies of his victims.
By now, the length and size of his penis have become common knowledge to the public. Over at YouTube, the videos describe his organ as really large. His rape victims demonstrate an open “O” with their thumb and pointer finger. They say it is 5-and-a-half inches in length but the size has become their problem because when he forced his penis into their anus, it was really painful.
Abe Arganiosa’s insolence evidently lead him to act as a false lawyer for the real rapist who is crying for rape. I have proven on this article that Bro. Eli Soriano is innocent of that crime. Crying for justice in behalf of a rapist who claims to be raped is not only stupid but also reflects the kind of preacher that Abe Arganiosa is. He is a homophobic celibate and narcissistic bigot who doesn’t care to be insolent without even analyzing and investigating what is true or not.
Filed under: abe arganiosa, catholicism | Tagged: abe arganiosa, alleged, Ang Dating Daan, bible, Christian, church, Daniel Veridiano, Eli Sorian, government, innocence, Members, New Testament, Presumption of Innocence, Puto, rape |