Here is another article for the Catholic Priest, Abe Arganiosa who doesn’t stop to post his delusional statements on his blog. Apparently, the Catholic Priest would really write something on an article without careful examination if what he is stating is accurate or not. He points out that Bro. Eli is not facing his accusers which for him is a sign of guilt. Let me quote his statement from his article, YOUNG CATHOLIC APOLOGIST FROM UNIVERSITY OF SAN CARLOS, CEBU CITY BRILLIANTLY REFUTED THE LIES AND DISTORTIONS OF DATING DAAN.
“FR. ABE: LEGAL ACCUSATIONS EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE ERRONEOUS WERE FACED BY CHRIST. THUS, BY DOING SO HE PROVED HIS INNOCENCE AND REVEALED THE IMMORALITIES OF HIS ACCUSERS. IF MAMA ELI WILL FACE HIS ACCUSERS LIKE CHRIST THEN HE CAN PROVE HIS INNOCENCE. WHAT HE IS SHOWING ARE SIGNS OF GUILT.”
The first sentence is misleading. The Lord Jesus Christ did not voluntarily surrendered in order to be put to trial before the court of Pontius Pilate. Keep in mind that the Lord Jesus Christ was betrayed by Judas. The High Priest during his time actually paid Judas to do the deed of betrayal.
Now the feast of unleavened bread drew nigh, which is called the Passover. And the chief priests and scribes sought how they might kill him; for they feared the people.
Then entered Satan into Judas surnamed Iscariot, being of the number of the twelve. And he went his way, and communed with the chief priests and captains, how he might betray him unto them. And they were glad, and covenanted to give him money. And he promised, and sought opportunity to betray him unto them in the absence of the multitude.
In addition to that, there is an account of escape made by Christ in order to avoid those people who wants to put him to death. That was carefully written by St. John.
What Abe Arganiosa does right now is a result of a reckless thought resulting to a delusion. Even in the law of man, a person cannot be called guilty unless proven in court; thus the presumption of innocence is formulated. According to lectlaw.com, and I shall quote.
INNOCENCE, PRESUMPTION OF
The indictment or formal charge against any person is not evidence of guilt. Indeed, the person is presumed by the law to be innocent. The law does not require a person to prove his innocence or produce any evidence at all. The Government has the burden of proving a person guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and if it fails to do so the person is (so far as the law is concerned) not guilty.
Even the bible stated an instance wherein the presumption of innocence is applicable just like what happened to St. Paul.
(Acts 16:37) NIV
But Paul said to the officers: “They beat us publicly without a trial, even though we are Roman citizens, and threw us into prison. And now do they want to get rid of us quietly? No! Let them come themselves and escort us out.”
The Apostle Paul appealed to the Roman Soldiers of an unjust treatment that they’ve received because of the fact that what happened to them lacks trial. It is indeed against human standards to execute a person without due process even in the Roman Law. What happens to Bro. Eli may be similar to what happened to St. Paul. We see a Catholic Priest who was suppose to be regarded as God’s messenger by Catholics but is doing the same thing that the Roman soldiers did. He actually stated that Bro. Eli Soriano is guilty despite the fact that none of his cases were proven in court, ultimately none were proven in the Supreme Court.
In fact, the Rape Case which the Catholic Priest loves and adores to repeatedly say was already dismissed on grounds that it lacks substance.
The case was only cause by a rift between INC and ADD according to the decision. The prosecutor was able to see that the complainant was ill-motivated because Daniel Veridiano was excommunicated from the church and later on transferred to INC, thus lessens his credibility.
More information can be found on http://jakeastudillo.wordpress.com/.
Is there any particular reason why the Catholic Priest is fond of repeating to state that Bro. Eli is a Rapist on his trash articles? Was he there when the incident happened? Was he ever a victim of rape to cry for justice? The Catholic Priest, if he he is still on his right senses, cannot and will never claim an affirmative answer to all these questions. It was clearly a trash talk and a resort to insult of a person who is unable to reason out effectively.
To make his trash talk worse, he pointed out that Bro. Eli did not apologize on his alleged crimes after I’ve stated the incident that happened during the time of Inquisition.
FR. ABE: THAT IS THE GREATNESS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH. OUR LEADERS HAVE APOLOGIZED FOR THE SINS OF OUR MEMBERS BUT MAMA ELI IS NOT APOLOGIZING FOR HIS VICTIMS AND FOR HIS LIES. THE PROTESTANT LEADERS HAVE NOT APOLOGIZED FOR THE CATHOLICS THEY ANNIHILATED, FOR OUR FAITHFUL THEY HAVE TORTURED AND FOR THE CATHOLIC CHURCHES-MONASTERIES THEY BURNED.
Bro. Eli Soriano has nothing to apologize. After all, the reason why he does not apologize is because he is not guilty of any crime. On the other hand, the act of apology that Pope John Paul II did for the 300,000 people who were murdered during inquisition is a proof of admission of guilt. They really have something to apologize that’s why he did, whereas Bro. Eli does not have anything to apologize at all. His guilt only occurs in the perverted mind of Abe Arganiosa.
Filed under: abe arganiosa, Bro. Eli Soriano | Tagged: abe arganiosa, Ang Dating Daan, betrayal, bible, Bro. Eli Soriano, Christian, Christianity, Eli Soriano, Eliseo Soriano, escaped, innocence, Jesus Christ, jews, Judas, law, Pilate, Presumption of Innocence, priest, Roman, rome, Sannedrines, Soldiers, The Old Path, trash talk, trial, University |