Bro. Eli Soriano Sample Clips of Actual Debates VS. Catholics

In order to refute the claim of some Catholic Apologist who visits this blogsite, I decided to show some video clips uploaded on Youtube of some of the debates that we already have against Catholics.

Bro. Eli Soriano VS. Mr. Froilan Garza

Bro.Eli Soriano VS. MR. Rey Entila

Bro. Eli Soriano VS. Mr. Victor Villas

Bro. Eli Soriano VS. Mr. Ben Naluz

The funny thing about these Catholics is they never dared to let a Catholic Priest face Bro. Eli Soriano in a debate. Yet some of them have the guts to say that Bro. Eli Soriano is afraid to accept their challenge while their teaching have been proven to false so many times in the past.

About these ads

36 Responses

  1. hahaha .. see how ignorant you are. your PAPA Eli faced catholics who are not really official apologists. another thing is that. WE ALREADY WATCHED those videos. THE ONLY THING THAT PAPA ELI SORIANO HAS is “PRIDE” AND “LOUD CHEERS OF HIS COHORTS” well as a matter of fact. THERE ARE NUMEROUS FALLACIES WHICH ELI SORIANO HAS DONE. and HE ONLY MADE HIS “CHEERING SQUAD” AS AN ATTENTION GETTER in order to put into embarassment his catholic opponent.
    What is funny is that, ADD has NEVER (I GUESS, CORRECT ME IF IM WRONG .HEHEHE) Showed the debate of PAPA Eli with the Catholic APologist named Bro. Jerry.. hehehehe.. do you know that? :P

    WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO ENNUMERATE AND EXPOSE ELI SORIANO’S FALLACIES COMMITED ON THE VIDEOS YOU POSTED? hehehehe

  2. @ Beltran O.P.

    Are you from Las Piñas Mister Beltran? If you are just from Metro Manila, it means that you may have watched the debates of Bro. Eli on National Televison. May I remind you that a Bro. Eli was never called “Papa” (which means father) by his Christian brothers. It is prohibited by Christ base on the Scriptures (Mat. 23:9).

    If you are claiming that we have a debate with a certain “Jerry” that we never showed, you have a chance to show it yourself and prove your claim. But where is your video? If you cannot show any solid evidence of such debate, it will just be a good example of a hearsay. However, I will still do my homework of researching if there is really such a debate in our library for your convenience.

    FYI: Mr. Garza and Mr. Villas belong to a group called St. Peter Men’s Society while Mr. Entila is a CFD from Bacolod. Are you sure that they are not official Apologist? If that is the case, we may not accept debates from these kind of people anymore because you are claiming that they are not really official apologist. Have a Catholic Priest defend your faith from now on.

    • mr beltran labanan niyo nalang ng debate kapatid na eli soriano isama lahat ng maisasama mo papa, lahat ng cardinal, mga pari ng maraming natapos na kurso sama mo lahat laban sa isang high school undergrand. pag natalo nyo sama ako sa catholico pangako yan . kung mananalo kayo singko tamang isang libo.

  3. May I remind the gentleman from Legaspi that this is an English Blog. Your posts will be deleted within 24 hours upon reading this. It has been clear that this Mister Arganiosa is just like any other Catholic Priest who cannot face brother Eli in a debate. Brother Eli has been preaching for over 40 years and no Priest ever dared to debate with him during that specified period. If you want to know my identity, you can meet me inside the ADD Convention Center every Saturday.

    • You are not answering my question. Are you afraid of Fr. Abe? How come you are hiding your identity to the good priest? If you want to negotiate for a debate, then by all means introduce yourself. That’s basic etiquette in human relation which is apparently lacking in your kind. You are creating a delusion that the priest is afraid of you when in fact you are the one who is afraid for the simple reason that you are hiding your identity from him so that you can attack him with impunity. How pathetic.

      Sa laiko nga lang timbuwang ka na eh. Sa pari pa kaya?

      • The so called “good priest” doesn’t want to negotiate for a debate. He keeps on making improbable conditions on his blog. It just simply proves that he cannot make a good stand on what he says.

        If you want to know my identity, convince him to negotiate for a debate on National Television and then we’ll talk. In addition, I am not the one who will debate with him. There is no sense to say that I cannot win over a Priest. I also doubt your identity being a pure Catholic. Most of the things that you have stated does not belong to the Catholic Church. From my analysis, most of them are similar to the way of reasoning of the group of Wilfredo Santiago which is an expelled member of the Church.

  4. False teachers are fund of starting an argument. Ang Dating Daan are always challenging the Roman Catholic church to prove their doctrines. I find it very interesting to scrutinize…

  5. when you reply and comment on The splendor of the church blog pls. write it in english because not all readers understand tagalog. The Splendor of the Church is read by many people in other countries. Unless you are afraid of unveiling your senseless arguments. Please, kindly write it in English.

    • Tell that to the writer of the blog as well.

  6. How the can the priest negotiate with your kind if you don’t reveal your identity to him? You can’t just deal with someone with an unknown identity. That’s basic common sense. Don’t deal with strangers. If you are really serious for a debate, then introduce yourself to the good priest as Soriano’s feeler and lay your proposition. Unless you do so, you are just bluffing. The priest has already answered your challenge. It’s high time that you reveal your true self. Or perhaps you are really afraid?

    [In addition, I am not the one who will debate with him. There is no sense to say that I cannot win over a Priest. ]

    Because you are afraid, plain and simple. You tried to rattle the priest through your “kuyog” tactic in the comment section of his blog but got surprised when the priest matched your attack fire with fire. You know that you can’t win against the priest. I read your exchanges and you and your buddies got busted big time. ha ha ha

    [I also doubt your identity being a pure Catholic. Most of the things that you have stated does not belong to the Catholic Church. From my analysis, most of them are similar to the way of reasoning of the group of Wilfredo Santiago which is an expelled member of the Church.]

    Oh really? At one point, you are saying that I am Fr. Abe. Now you are claiming that I’m from Willy’s group. Which is which? Ano ba talaga kuya? You seems confused. It might be the result of the embarrassment that you have suffered from our latest exchanges. Congratulations, your deceit and ignorance of scriptures are broadcasted worldwide through the priest’s blog.

  7. Now your writing style reverted back to the writing style of the Priest. Yes, I believe that you are the lame Priest with the support of Wilfredo Santiago’s Group. I will write a separate article to prove that. If you want to know my identity, that’s easy. Are you ready to debate with Bro. Eli on television with the facilitites of UNTV 37 and your own Catholic Television Program which is now possible? Or rather you will resort to improbable conditions to avoid it?

    I did not suffer any embarrassement with all decency that I have from all our exchanges. Rather, all the excessive sarcasm and appeal to mockery that you’ve used just back-fired at you. It just gave us a glimpse of what the Catholic Church really is beneath the cloak of pretense and hypocrisy.

  8. [Now your writing style reverted back to the writing style of the Priest. Yes, I believe that you are the lame Priest with the support of Wilfredo Santiago’s Group. I will write a separate article to prove that. If you want to know my identity, that’s easy. Are you ready to debate with Bro. Eli on television with the facilitites of UNTV 37 and your own Catholic Television Program which is now possible? Or rather you will resort to improbable conditions to avoid it?]

    I think you have a pathetic talent of analyzing writing styles so stop pretending that you are an expert because you are not. You are indeed flattering me by saying that my style is the same as the priest. Guess again. he he he

    [I did not suffer any embarrassment with all decency that I have from all our exchanges. Rather, all the excessive sarcasm and appeal to mockery that you’ve used just back-fired at you. It just gave us a glimpse of what the Catholic Church really is beneath the cloak of pretense and hypocrisy.]

    Yes you are. You got exposed that’s why you deleted our exchanges, otherwise why delete it? I think the days when you guys attack the catholic faith with impunity are over. It seems that the best way to hammer reason among your kind is to use your own brand of language. And based on my experience, it is effective.

    • You did not even answer the challenge thrown to you. “Are you ready to debate with Bro. Eli on television with the facilitites of UNTV 37 and your own Catholic Television Program which is now possible? Or rather you will resort to improbable conditions to avoid it?”

      Do you think that your Fallacy, Appeal to Mockery is effective? Indeed it is effective to show to the world what Catholic Priests really are beneath those white skirts lies a wolf in sheep’s clothing.

      • Our priest has already answered your bluff. Now have the decency to show your true identity so real talk about the debate can begin. Or maybe you are cowering in fear because you know first hand what you are up against? Our priest ain’t afraid of your fugitive preacher. Fr. Abe is not hiding his identity when he defended the catholic faith. While you and your kind makes every effort imaginable to hide your identity while attacking our faith. That’s is treachery and utter cowardice. If you are man enough show yourself. Gusto mo two on two pa, ikaw at puno mo at kaming dalawa ni Fr. Abe. Ilitaw mo puno mo. Eyeball to eyeball debate.

        • You did not accept the challenge thrown at you Mister Abraham Arganiosa. Instead,you give improbable conditions in order to evade from the challenge of a debate on National Television. Now you continue to insists on finding out our identity but you fail to give a decent answer to our challenge. Open your communication lines on your television show and Bro. Eli Soriano will debate with you. That will be broad casted on UNTV 37 as well. That is our proposal which you cannot accept because of your fear to suffer the same fate as your Comrades.

          • Have you read the good priest’s blog? Fr. Abe has already accepted your challenge. Now have the decency to show your true identity and present your fugitive leader.

            Stop creating illusion that we catholics are afraid of your kind because we don’t. On the contrary you are the one who is afraid based on your actuations. Why is it that you don’t want to show your real identity? What you are doing is really ridiculous and cheap trying to arrange a debate while withhelding your identity. Anong malay namin kung sino kang hudas o hudesa na mahilig mang-gudtime? Do you have authorization to speak on behalf of your fugitive leader? How can we know since up to now you are so secretive of your identity? That’s why serious talk about the debate starts when you manned up and formally introduce your self to the priest. Until you do so, all your talk about the debate are just crap. Bulok na yang istilo mo.

            Show your self and present your fugitive preacher. Debate should be face to face, eyeball to eyeball. Your challenge about debate in the internet is just all crap. A pathetic excuse not to face our catholic faith defenders.

            3 Jn 1:13-14 (Ang Biblia)

            13 Maraming mga bagay ang isusulat ko sana sa iyo, datapuwa’t hindi ko ibig isulat sa iyo ng tinta at panulat:

            14 Datapuwa’t inaasahan kong makita kang madali, at tayo’y magkakausap ng mukhaan.

  9. @ CHRISTIANACCUSER:

    ahahaha.. this guy is really fantasizing at all. I WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON HIS STATEMENT ON BRO. PARABANOG:

    ” I also doubt your identity being a pure Catholic. Most of the things that you have stated does not belong to the Catholic Church. ”

    THIS IS A MANIFESTATION OF IGNORANCE. why? are you surprised? that a CATHOLIC LAY MAN would fire you up? hahaha.. its just because you’re not familiar with outstanding Catholics like bro. parabanog, and Arch.. hehehe..

    Who told you that no Catholic Priest would like to debate PAPA Eli? hahaha..

    Are you sure MATTHEW 23:9 prohibits the calling of “father” ?? now MAKE AN ARTICLE!! WE’LL COMMENT THERE.. HAHAHAHA..

    FIND OUT BRO. JERRY DEBATE WITH IGLESIA NG DIOS KAY KRISTO HESUS HALIGI AT SALIGAN NG KATOTOHANAN SA BANSANG PILIPINAS INCORPORATED PRESIDING MINISTER PAPA ELI SORIANO… (whoooo!!! too long to mention)

  10. So its time for you christiandefender to reveal your true identy, how come you defended this ADD cult group and not even introducing yourself to Fr. Abe for the initial workout of the debate. . . Hahahahaha. . . scared ! ! ! ! !

    • There is no clear acceptance from his side. From what I can see, this will just be an unending blogwar since Mister Arganiosa Pussyfoots from an Awaited debate. Convince him to agree to a debate on National Televison and then we’ll talk.

  11. These Catholics never learned their lesson. Bro. Eli Soriano has debated with lots of Catholics and none of them prevailed.

    I know what will happen to this Priest.

    • Oh really? Then bring out your fugitive preacher from his hiding place. Don’t hide him.

      • Look who’s talking. It was Abe Arganiosa who is hiding and a fugitive from a debate. Open your communication lines on your television program and we shall talk.

      • Our preacher is not a fugitive. He is not even convicted of any crimes accused by manalistas. How could call him fugitive? He is not hiding. Well, you just don’t know where he is now.

  12. Are these catholics are ordinary plain catholic or catholics with knowlegde in apologetic. . .

  13. Then, why dont you ask that modern day Fr. Damaso Fr. Abe to debate Kuya Daniel on TV?

    if he claims that the truth is in him, then debate him immediately. unable to do that means he is coward and only knows degrading.

    but I think even to an INC minister, any CFDs wont prevail against them.

    this is one of Catholicism tactics, if a CFD lost, they will deny that they are not licensed or official apologist.

    this is the reason why a bishop or a cardinal don’t let a priest or they themselves have not guts to face to a debate with other anti Catholic preachers because once they do that and they lost, more Catholics will join to the opponent’s religion and they cannot alibi very well why they lost.

    the reason why you cant see the truth is because you chose darkness because your deeds are evil (Juan 3:19)

    to those devoted Catholics posting here, why cant you try to challenge an ADD Officer in Charge in a private room then record it on a video if the debate happens?

    let’s see if you are that brave enough and you dont only know is trashtalking and false accusations.

  14. to those Fr. Damaso’s supporters I mean Fr. Abe.

    pls. persuade him to challenge Bro. Eli’s nephew and then the ADD people will persuade shall persuade Mr. Razon.

    I am sure that Mr. Razon will immediately accept that because he is not coward.

    To Abe’s supporters, persuade your modern day Fr. Damaso idolized preacher to talk to Kuya Daniel where the debate should happen and what TV station will air on it and also the topic.

    unable to do that means you are really admit that bastard Fr. Abe is coward and an expert only in trashtalking.

    To Parabanog: You can debate Mr. Soriano via video conference like what the American Baptist Pastor did.

    tell Fr. Damaso I mean Fr. Abe to debate Mr. Soriano on video because either eyeball or video it’s only the same. they can see each other faces.

    but I could be better to face Mr. Razon who is in the Philippines because Mr. Razon’s religious views are inherited from his uncle Eli

    SO DEBATING WITH MR. RAZON IS TANTAMOUNT OF REFUTING MR. SORIANO’S TEACHINGS.

  15. Hindi po dapat tularan ang ASAL ng Paring ito:

    http://pinoyreformista.blogspot.com/2010/01/asal-ng-isang-paring-defensores-ng.html

  16. These Catholic are Always putting themselves in lots of excuses…Just set a Time and Date to when your priest or catholic defender will face Bro. Eli. I’m waiting.
    And to Finish these things just show them, or it might be your priest is just afraid to face Bro. Eli in national Television because your doctrine will be exposed in lots of fallacies…

  17. What can I say? Beltran’s is always a Beltran the same person but nothing to show. I’m waiting eagerly to when you are going to show your priest to face Bro Eli or maybe you Beltran if you want to..Hehe when?

  18. tapat ang DIYOS kaya matakot kayo mga bulaang propeta,tangapin ang katotohanan at yan ay ipinagkaloob na sa atin ang BIBLIA,maraming salamat sa DIYOS AMA at sa bugtong niyang ANAK ang ating PANGINOON KRISTOJESUS.

  19. Every person has its stand to proved his belief , even he has doubt about it but he is coward to accept that he cannot depend on his belief because their is no holy spirit guided on his way. But look at those people who have strong belief that his God is really a true God they are bold enough to shout to the whole world that his God is really a true one…. and even yourself can proved that… if you felt hunger in the word of God,its world painted in your mind and you really have joy and strong stands to follow His well and not yourself and disgusted to think about the things you have done before. Then I can say you are in the right track to follow God… but if all I mentioned was far from what you have done now then your god is not really a God of Abraham whom also my God, you can read His words in the bible from Genesis to Revelation.

  20. I am a Catholic and these videos are real eye openers. Ironically, it was Eli Soriano who indirectly encouraged me to open my Bible and do some research.

    Kudos to Bro. Eli!

  21. naghahasik na naman ng lagim ang blog ni Fr. Abe, maganda po sana masagot ang mga yun, salamat sa Dios!

  22. Bastos at duwag si paring Abe, puro satsat

  23. salamat sa Dios

  24. hindi matatalo ang sugo ng Dios

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: